In the CRS report to which the Senator referred, essentially he failed to note a footnote that says essentially that it does not appear that any evidence has been produced of actual violations of these provisions by Bull's Eye in the case at hand. If you assume they violated the law, then, of course, the exemption applies. The facts we know now suggest they knew nothing about the disappearance of the weapons, and this legislation will bar the individuals from court. I add one simple point. Even if we are slightly in doubt debating this issue, we should support Senator Mikulski's amendment which puts them in court.
Jack Reed: “In the CRS report to which the Senator referred, essentially he failed to note a footnote that says essentially that it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation related to Bull's Eye and supporting an amendment by Senator Mikulski.
Share
More from Jack Reed
I rise today to oppose a budget resolution my Republican colleagues have put before the U.S. Senate. The American people are worried because of the pure chaos let loose on them by President Trump and the Republican majority--whether it is…
Artificial intelligence will continue to shape the battlespace of the future, and our military must be equipped with every tactical and technical advantage it needs to win in this complex environment.
Ultimately, this is all about helping patients and families in their time of need as they face unimaginable circumstances. It provides direct support to these critical institutions that do incredible research, match donors and patients…





