I concur with the Senator's notion that the FDA could look at safety and effectiveness but the critical question is safety and effectiveness to do what? To do what the labeled use is or to do something else. And the language of the bill restricts the answer to that question, to do what, statutorily to simply say whatever the company puts into the label. And that seems to be the crux of this debate. Yes, they can look at safety and effectiveness; yes, they can look at technological change, but only in the context of what the company purports in the label to say is the intended use. They can't look beyond it.
Jack Reed: “I concur with the Senator's notion that the FDA could look at safety and effectiveness but the critical question is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of FDA authority regarding drug safety and effectiveness in relation to labeling.
Share
More from Jack Reed
The President has waged this war without public support or congressional consent, and it is far past time for accountability.
President Trump’s effort to turn the U.S. military into an investor in Venezuelan oil is a blatant abuse of power and taxpayer dollars.
Six months later, not a single objective has been achieved. Indeed, he has weakened our position in the Middle East and the world significantly.
His administration removed Nicolás Maduro from power, threw its weight behind the unelected leadership that replaced Maduro, and is now attempting to use U.S. military assets and taxpayer-backed financing to boost a private oil venture.





