I would say that intellectually why we are even having this debate is we have abandoned this concept of rationality. We don't think North Korea is rational. Again, that is an assumption that we have to look at closely as we look at some of these other things. In some respects, if they are totally irrational, then maybe there is a little hope of deterring them from doing anything, even with the national missile defense. But that is the difference. That is why my colleague from Massachusetts said we used to think about intentions, and now we don't. We made an intellectual decision we weren't going to look at that because we concluded they were irrational. I suggest that as we pursue this debate, we should look seriously at whether or not that assumption is valid.
Jack Reed: “I would say that intellectually why we are even having this debate is we have abandoned this concept of rationality. We…”
On the recordJuly 12, 2000
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of rationality in deterrence policy regarding North Korea.
Share
More from Jack Reed
Aug 18, 2026
While the President and his family accumulate billions of dollars through dubious deals, normal hardworking Americans are struggling just to get by.
Mar 21, 2026
No, I will not yield. By the way, these mandates and requirements would be effective immediately, meaning they must be implemented for the 2026 election, which, I should point out, is already underway. There are primaries that have been…
Jul 21, 2026
This measure is a tribute to Senator Graham’s tenacious, bipartisan work in support of Ukraine.
Aug 29, 2026
The President has waged this war without public support or congressional consent, and it is far past time for accountability.





