I rise in strong support of this legislation. I spent 12 years in the U.S. Army, I commanded infantry, paratroopers, qualified as Army Ranger, and I was issued an assault weapon. Mr. Chairman, I was not under any illusions as to why the Army gave me that weapon. It was not for target shooting, it was not for hunting. It was in defense of my country to kill people. That is why this weapon was designed, that is why this whole class of weapons were designed. The characteristics of high rates of fire, portability, being able to affix bayonets, all these things are designed for one purpose, a military purpose, and we should ban these weapons as we have banned other military weapons, like the machinegun, like Claymore mines, like a whole range of military weapons because in an ordered society where the rule of law should prevail and not who have the fastest draw or the most firepower, these weapons are not appropriate. Mr. Chairman, I urge passage of this legislation.
Editor's note · Context
Supporting legislation to ban assault weapons during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Jack Reed
I will not. But this is not the way the bill works. If you review the specific page and line that Senator Lee has referenced, page 14, line 15, and just look a few lines further in that same direction--specifically page 15, line 6--the…
Vague generalities are not helping this committee make critical judgments.
At a moment when U.S. forces are building up across the Caribbean and tensions with Venezuela are at a boiling point, the departure of our top military commander in the region sends an alarming signal of instability within the chain of…
No, I will not yield. By the way, these mandates and requirements would be effective immediately, meaning they must be implemented for the 2026 election, which, I should point out, is already underway. There are primaries that have been…





