It is clear even if you're not a lawyer that the First Amendment is totally irrelevant as a defense since -- as a defense to the question of whether somebody can be impeached for things they say and do as a public official.
Arguing against the First Amendment defense in the context of impeachment.
Share
More from David Cicilline
The problem is we haven't committed to a mission. I have asked Secretary Blinken to define what he thinks the mission is.
The Goldman Act empowered the State Department to seek the return of American children, yet, the department, in my opinion, has not used the full of range of tools as Congress has intended.
We have to recognize that would include occupying part of Russia, toppling their government, and replacing them with a different government.
What we’ve said to the General Assembly is you’re going to have to have a transition plan that takes that into account.
Other voices in this conversation
