David Cicilline actually said...

Yes. The amendment I believe uses the language 'has.' So it means current arrangements, affiliations, relationships, or substantial financia...

the burden properly rests on the testifying witness to make these disclosures, and it shouldn't rest on the members of the committee

I implore my colleagues not to see this as a partisan issue.

I would just like to finally associate myself with the remarks with Congressman Deutch regarding the Logan Act violations...