David Cicilline actually said...

This amendment was not offered last time we were here. Had it been offered, I would have, of course, supported it.

If the gentleman is yielding, I think there is no suggestion in the rule that an unwitting failure to disclose carries any penalty.

Yes. The amendment I believe uses the language 'has.' So it means current arrangements, affiliations, relationships, or substantial financia...

the burden properly rests on the testifying witness to make these disclosures, and it shouldn't rest on the members of the committee