On the recordJuly 28, 2020
the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.
Source
congress.govthe most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.
Cicilline references a Supreme Court principle on limits to harmful speech.
Share & report
More from David Cicilline
I rise in opposition to H.R. 1690 and associate myself with the remarks of Mr. Connolly.
Because it ignores the fundamental reality that our country has been made stronger, more vibrant, more dynamic, more powerful because of the arrival of immigrants, and refugees, and asylum seekers.
Democrats have put forth a range of solutions to prevent gun violence, to support law enforcement, and to solve crimes.
Again, I reiterate the fact that the children under Trump were snatched away from their families, purposely, to discourage them from coming.