On the recordJuly 28, 2020
the most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.
Source
congress.govthe most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic.
Cicilline references a Supreme Court principle on limits to harmful speech.
Share
More from David Cicilline
When I think of the consequences for humanity if America stopped our beautiful asylum system that gave refuge to people...
The reason is pretty clear: Short-barrel rifles can have the conceal-ability and maneuverability of a pistol but with the fire power and accuracy of a rifle.
Can you just confirm that that money is in fact being appropriated to LGBTQI+ groups working on inclusive development programs around the world?
The problem is we haven't committed to a mission. I have asked Secretary Blinken to define what he thinks the mission is.