David Cicilline actually said...

If the gentleman is yielding, I think there is no suggestion in the rule that an unwitting failure to disclose carries any penalty.

Yes. The amendment I believe uses the language 'has.' So it means current arrangements, affiliations, relationships, or substantial financia...

I implore my colleagues not to see this as a partisan issue.

I think if this question were posed to witnesses before the hearing... that is the whole point of putting it in the rules.