I simply believe that Congress should be extremely chary in yielding its power of the purse to the executive branch. I hold this view on the basis of my Senate service under eight Presidents of both parties during my 35 years in the Senate, and notwithstanding the cordial relationships I have had with all of them. I continue to believe that the executive branch, which under our Constitution, quite properly is a separate power center with its own agenda and its own priorities, inevitably will seek and use any additional power to achieve its objectives. And the pending grant of veto power over specific items, I fear, will surely give even the most benign and well-motivated Chief Executive a new means for exercising undue influence and coercion over individual members of the legislative branch. I hold this view, notwithstanding my loyalty and respect for President Clinton, who I know would use such a grant of authority wisely.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the line-item veto and its implications for congressional power.
Share
More from Claiborne Pell
I oppose strongly the amendment on nuclear testing offered by the Senators from Arizona and Nevada, Mr. Kyl and Mr. Reid. The United States is currently in the forefront of nations seeking a comprehensive ban on nuclear explosions. Members…
now is not the time to make the largest cuts in education in U.S. history. There is simply no growth in this budget for our Nation's many important education programs. To my mind, if we jeopardize the education of our Nation's children we…
I would like to clarify my understanding of some language contained in section 2(B) of the section of the pending amendment entitled Determination of Substantial Investment. It is my understanding that this section of the legislation is…
at this time when the fiscal year 1997 appropriations level for the National Endowment for the Arts is being determined, I would like to illustrate the importance of the arts to the education of our children and to the growth of the local…





