I would like to indicate that all of us agree with many of the issues raised by the gentleman from New York. Al Shanker would love to have properly certified, highly qualified teachers in all New York City schools. He cannot do that. We cannot do that with any kind of mandate. We would love to have the books, the library equipment, and other materials in those schools. The Chapter II Program that some would like to eliminate helps them to do just that, as a matter of fact. But we cannot guarantee it unless we send money, and that is the focus of this debate. Local citizens and the courts must deal with the issue of school finance equalization. Local citizens and the courts--not the Federal Government. In Pennsylvania, we have an ideal equalization formula and it works well by setting a base for every student. If somebody is able to do more than that in the local area, fine, but States provide the base to make sure that everyone has equal opportunity. So, this argument is not about school resources. The argument is that if we do not send any money, we send unfunded mandates, and a golden opportunity for all sorts of litigation. So, the little bit of money that they would have to spend to improve their education system instead is spent in court. That helps the lawyers. That does not help the youngsters that we are trying to educate or their parents.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the need for funding in education and the impact of unfunded mandates.
Share
More from William F. Goodling
I continue to believe that state and local educational agencies, along with parents, are in a better position than we are in Washington to determine how best to use federal funds to help students improve their academic achievement.
I do not usually take 1 minutes, but sitting here listening to the 1 minutes I became very, very amused because some very intelligent people would have us believe that somehow or other last year's budget process had something to do with…
I would like to clarify that a State could utilize the waiver provisions under Part D of Title IX for purposes of obtaining waivers of requirements under Subpart 2 of Part D of Title I--Improved Education for Disadvantaged Children. It has…
I take this time to indicate to all of my colleagues that H.R. 6 is to extend for 5 years the authorization of appropriations for the programs under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. That is the purpose of the Elementary…





