I think it represents a very, very good compromise between very divergent views on this question of judicial review. I think it is better than what we started out with, that it is clearly an improvement. I am delighted to accept the measure.
William Clinger: “I think it represents a very, very good compromise between very divergent views on this question of judicial review. I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to judicial review during House floor debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
That is absolutely untrue. What we are saying is that the procurement officials, very front and center, they are very much on the front line of the decisions that they make, are going to be given a little more flexibility, a little more…
I rise in fervent support of S. 1124, the Department of Defense authorization conference report. I want to commend the chairman... The provisions that are in this bill are consistent with H.R. 1670, the Federal Acquisition Reform Act of…
I would just question the appropriateness of the inspector general making policy in these kinds of areas. It seems to me it is the policymakers of the Department of Defense who really should be paid attention to in this area.
In fact, the offsets can come, when this happens, if the President decides to waive it now, he, under this bill, would be required to provide the offset. We could make it very clear that they were not to be taken out of military spending…





