I have to suggest that it is a little more than a minor disagreement. I think that in my view it really goes to the heart of this bill. We have a fundamental disagreement over the impact. I believe, and I hope a majority will believe, that what we have provided here is the kind of flexibility we need to really get the reforms that are necessary. The other side does not agree with that, so we will debate that in more detail later on, but it is not a minor disagreement.
William Clinger: “I have to suggest that it is a little more than a minor disagreement. I think that in my view it really goes to the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing disagreements over a bill during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
Just to briefly say, Mr. Speaker, the President has agreed to the date. Obviously he is confident that he is in fact going to be reelected. I do not share that confidence, but he believes that he will be. Therefore, he is going to have…
Despite the fact the gentleman opposed my position on title I, I would say what I consider to be a very generous example of noblesse oblige, we are prepared to accept the gentleman's amendment, and I understand that any problems have been…
That is absolutely untrue. What we are saying is that the procurement officials, very front and center, they are very much on the front line of the decisions that they make, are going to be given a little more flexibility, a little more…
I would indicate that I think a ``yes'' vote on this matter would in effect be saying that we would allow an unfunded mandate to be passed through, or open the door to passing through, an unfunded mandate to the States. Those who would…





