this rule fails to make in order a number of important amendments needed to bring about greater accountability in the Executive Office of the President. For that reason I must oppose the rule and urge its defeat. For the past 18 months, as the ranking Republican on the Committee on Government Operations, I have seen first-hand the numerous management problems at the White House. Let me mention just a few: The White House argued that travel office employees were fired for gross mismanagement, but the only gross mismanagement was the way the White House handled the matter; in an attempt to convince Americans that unanswered phone calls and busy signals were not the result of mismanagement, the White House spent $27 million on a new phone system. But they violated the Competition in Contracting Act by limiting bids for the job; last June, the General Accounting Office found that the White House mismanaged the purchase of a computer system by failing to follow proper procurement procedures; 14 months into the Clinton administration, the White House admitted that more than 100 staffers lacked security clearances and one-third of the 1,044 employees did not have permanent passes. Talk about mismanagement; finally, the White House further mismanaged personnel by allowing numerous employees to double-dip, receiving double salary payments. Even more disquieting than these management shortcomings has been the attempt by the administration to cover them up.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing management issues in the Executive Office of the President during a debate on a proposed rule.
Share
More from William Clinger
75 percent of the American people support the line-item veto, and have supported the line-item veto for a long time. It has been suggested that there are a number of reasons why we should not enact this legislation. It has been suggested…
I want to announce to the Members of the House that the White House has, within the last half hour, turned over a box of documents to my committee, the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, regarding our investigation into the…
The conference report is intended to clarify that it is the intent of Congress that section 3512 requires agency information collection requests applicable to 10 or more members of the public to be submitted to OMB and receive a valid…
I would just question the appropriateness of the inspector general making policy in these kinds of areas. It seems to me it is the policymakers of the Department of Defense who really should be paid attention to in this area.





