I reluctantly oppose the amendment. I know there are many Members on this side of the aisle and certain Members on the other side of the aisle who feel this is an area that should be exempt, sacrosanct, should be protected from what we are providing for the President with the line-item veto. But I submit, Mr. Chairman, this amendment really flies in the face of the purpose of what we are trying to accomplish in H.R. 2, and would, in fact, restrict the President's rescission authority even more greatly than does current law. It would go beyond what we can do under existing law, and I think the amendment should be defeated. I think the gentleman's amendment would single out for special treatment defense appropriations of more than $50 million, and I would say to the gentleman and to the Members there are many programs, nondefense-related programs, that rise to the level of pork or could rise to the level of pork which would be exempted from even being considered for a line-item rescission under this bill.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the President's line-item veto authority during a House floor debate.
Share
More from William Clinger
Reauthorization, if there are no additional new mandates imposed as a result of a reauthorization of an existing program, it would have no effect at all. It is only where there would be an additional or added mandate that would exceed the…
As chairman of the Government Reform and Oversight Committee, I am very pleased to rise in strong support of this measure. Two of the provisions in this measure were initiated in the Government Reform and Oversight Committee, and we are…
I would just question the appropriateness of the inspector general making policy in these kinds of areas. It seems to me it is the policymakers of the Department of Defense who really should be paid attention to in this area.
It is a historic moment; the first conference report from a Republican-controlled Congress in 40 years. And I agree with the gentleman from California, it is significant. This bill will ensure that Congress and Federal agencies have more…





