The Secretary would like to have it, because it would end up supporting his needs for additional money for readiness that his President will not give in to because he pulls his defense budget number out of the air, as you know.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing defense budget issues and readiness funding.
Share
More from W. Weldon
I do not understand this amendment because we reached a compromise on the floor of the House last year, and it was not as my colleagues said, Republicans. In fact, I have the vote here. It was 243 to 172. The last time I checked, there are…
on rollcall No. 261 and 262, I was unavoidably detained giving a speech to a policy conference sponsored by Brookings Institute. Had I been present, I would have voted ``no'' on 261 and ``aye'' on 262. ____________________
I will say that is absolutely, totally wrong. There are some within the State Department who take offense to the fact that Members of Congress will travel to countries like this. Let me say to my colleagues in this body, many of you will…
Approximately 1 month ago, 25 Members of Congress, including the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Edwards) and I, introduced the Nuclear Security Initiative Act of 2003. This bill is the first major, comprehensive expansion of our efforts to work…





