I would add, Mr. Chairman, this is the only case I can think of where we are going to see an amendment offered that eliminates a specific type of technology that may or may not be requested by the Pentagon. We could say, ``Why don't we limit the nuclear capability of our aircraft carriers?,'' or ``Why don't we build our nuclear-powered submarine?'' We are talking one technology that may or may not be requested by the Defense Department and saying, ``Do not explore this even if it may down the road provide protection for our citizens.'' I do not understand that mentality. What we are saying is not to force them to deploy a space-based system, we are saying, ``Come back and tell us what it is that you think we should do and how quickly can we do it.'' That is what we are suggesting. I think it is ill-advised in this case to limit the technology.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to technology requested by the Pentagon during a committee meeting.
Share
More from W. Weldon
I am concerned by the inclusion of provisions in this bill related to eligible trustee relationships with eligible institutions and the negative implications that these provisions will have on the availability of low-cost Federal loans and…
today, I was presenting the keynote address at the World Russian Forum. Therefore, on rollcall votes 153, 154, 155, and 156, I was not recorded to vote. Had I been recorded, I would have voted ``nay'' on rollcall vote 153, and ``yea'' on…
I first met Ronald Reagan through a local leader in our State, Faith Whittlesey, who was one of Ronald Reagan's earliest supporters in the eastern part of America for the Presidency. And it was a glorious day in 1984 when Ronald Reagan…
I rise not to refute or answer the comments that we just heard for the last several hours, but I will make a couple of comments. First of all, rather than listen to Members of Congress and this body talk about the conditions in Iraq…





