I would like to say at the outset that even though there were two Republicans against two Democrats on this issue, my position would have been at the outset that there are many, many Democrats, including most on the Armed Services Committee, who are, in fact, in agreement with the position that we would have taken that further defense cuts would not be in the best interest of America, our national security, and freedom-loving people around the world. This would not have been, in my opinion, a Democrat versus Republican debate. It would have been a debate between those who are the majority in the Congress who feel that we are at the point where we cannot cut defense spending any further.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the need for defense spending and the bipartisan agreement on national security.
Share
More from W. Weldon
as I have stated before, I do not want to alienate Moldova. The citizens of Moldova are not at fault. They are good people. It is their government that is at fault, and I do not think it is fair that its people suffer. Something must be…
I am concerned by the inclusion of provisions in this bill related to eligible trustee relationships with eligible institutions and the negative implications that these provisions will have on the availability of low-cost Federal loans and…
Sometimes the bureaucrats in this city just do not get it. Before coming to Congress, Mr. Speaker, I was an educator, but I was also a volunteer firefighter and a fire chief in my home State of Pennsylvania. There are 32,000 fire…
Mr. Chairman, I want to, first of all, before I enter into a colloquy with the distinguished chairman, thank the chairman of the subcommittee. Even before it was created, the leaders on this subcommittee were instrumental in helping our…





