there is a provision in our bill about a program called Joint Advanced Strike Technology, also known to industry as the joint strike fighter, that very few Members of this body have any knowledge of. Our committee recommendation in this bill on the Joint Advanced Strike Technology Program restricts funding and asks for further justification for the program. This action has been viewed as controversial by some because it is seen as directed at one particular military service. Others find our action controversial because they claim that the committee's action came as a surprise and without sufficient debate. I appreciate these views, however this body needs to more fully understand the basis for the committee's action on JAST. First, let me say that while most of you have never heard of this program called JAST, CBO estimates it is a $300 billion program. Yes, I said $300 billion. That is more than 7 B-2 programs and is well over the total amount of the entire DOD budget that we are debating. DOD wants to spend $300 billion of your money, but the Pentagon refuses to classify JAST as an acquisition program--for reasons only Pentagon lawyers can seek to justify.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Joint Advanced Strike Technology program and its funding implications.
Share
More from W. Weldon
I rise to make one simple point. From the period of time in the 1990s, starting with President Bush, Sr., and continuing through President Clinton, our troops were deployed 149 times around the world. Many of these deployments were…
I rise this evening for this short Special Order to express my personal outrage regarding the treatment of some brave military personnel who simply are trying to tell the truth. Madam Speaker, over the past 3 months, I have outlined for…
I rise today in solid support of this legislation and with deep thanks to the leadership on both sides of the aisle for their work on this issue. This is a critically important piece of legislation, not just for the people of Ukraine but…
I can tell Members that as this story unfolds, we will continue to be vigilant in prosecuting not just those soldiers who were involved, but those superiors who in some cases ordered our soldiers to do the acts that they were asked to do…





