As the gentleman knows, as a Republican and a colleague, I supported the same position he did on NAFTA, which is opposition to NAFTA, because I felt that this administration would not impose the requirements on Mexico in terms of improving wage rates and labor conditions and tougher environmental laws. So in not doing that, our companies would, in fact, fly south to Mexico, which they have done. But the interesting point that I want to tie in here is organized labor has been so quick to criticize Republicans on issues like NAFTA when, in fact, it was this administration who shoved NAFTA down our throats in the Congress. And I want to raise one more point.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to NAFTA and its implications for labor and environmental standards.
Share
More from W. Weldon
Mr. Speaker, I want to support the President's healthy forests initiative, but I am here today to put the President and the administration on notice because I am not happy. Mr. Speaker, it was just 6 years ago when I chaired the…
Mr. Chairman, I thank the distinguished ranking member and good friend for his comments. Just for the record, I would remind my good friend and colleague, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. McCotter) that there will no provisional authority…
I am concerned by the inclusion of provisions in this bill related to eligible trustee relationships with eligible institutions and the negative implications that these provisions will have on the availability of low-cost Federal loans and…
I will say that is absolutely, totally wrong. There are some within the State Department who take offense to the fact that Members of Congress will travel to countries like this. Let me say to my colleagues in this body, many of you will…





