This amendment makes numerous technical and other minor wording changes to the bill. Together, these revisions clarify that the bill does not authorize duplicative agency review proceedings, does not require duplicative project notification and initiation of agency review procedures, and does not allow permitting decisions to be challenged in court by parties who did not first present their arguments in the administrative proceedings that produced the challenged permit. The amendment constitutes an agreement reached between the Judiciary Committee and the other committee of jurisdiction, the Natural Resources Committee. Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to support the amendment. I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Tom Marino
This amendment makes three impactful changes to SITSA. First, it changes and sets strict definitions of what constitutes a controlled substance analogue suitable for inclusion in schedule A. A substance proposed for inclusion in schedule A…
There could have been significant cost reductions there if we did not have to wait for the years and years that it took to get the permitting process through.
Section 9 of the bill would provide guidance in sentencing during the current problematic time for courts, prosecutors, and defendants. Courts are having difficulties similar to those of law enforcement because of the constantly evolving…
Why is that? We are self-sufficient in oil. Why are we exporting oil and buying oil from many countries that don't even like us?





