Mr. Chair, one last time, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle would strike from the bill the Separation of Powers Restoration Act and the judicial review provisions of the Regulatory Accountability Act. One last time, that attempt should be rejected. We need a strong judiciary, not a supine one, to stand up to agency overreach and abuse and protect the liberty and property of the America from the long hands of Washington's restless bureaucrats. The amendment also would exclude from title I's rulemaking reforms rules issued under the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. Chemical safety is important to all of us. Congress worked hard on chemical safety legislation. But it is smarter regulations, supported by sounder science, at less cost that will best produce chemical safety under that act. That is precisely the kind of regulation that will happen once the 21st century rulemaking reforms in the Regulatory Accountability Act become law. I urge my colleagues to oppose the amendment. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Tonko). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced that the noes appeared to have it.
Share & report
More from Tom Marino
Current legal framework, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, more commonly known as ECPA, is insufficient for addressing the need of the technology and society of the 21st century.
I thank the chairman. Mr. Chairman, I rise in strong support of H.R. 5, the Regulatory Accountability Act. This bill represents a monumental opportunity for the American people. After 8 years of one new crushing regulatory burden after…
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in support of my legislation to rename the Liberty, Pennsylvania, post office after Staff Sergeant Ryan Scott Ostrom. Ryan was born on September 23, 1979, in Wellsboro, Pennsylvania, where he attended Liberty High…
Mr. Speaker, I was unable to attend votes on June 8, 2017, on account of attending my son's graduation. Had I been present, I would have voted as follows: ``Yea'' for rollcall vote 295, ``yea'' for rollcall vote 296, ``yea'' for rollcall…





