It is in direct contradiction to principles of appropriations law and it is an affront to the powers granted to Congress in the Constitution.
Tim Murphy: “It is in direct contradiction to principles of appropriations law and it is an affront to the powers granted to Congress…”
Editor's note · Context
Murphy condemns a Treasury official's statement regarding appropriations.
Share
More from Tim Murphy
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Pennsylvania will be postponed. Amendment No. 156 Offered by Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania The…
Acting on these recommendations would improve EPA's ability to carry out its core mission, protecting human health and the environment.
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 752, line 19, strike ``$15,000,000'' and insert ``$20,000,000''. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to House…
Reclaiming my time, knowing that when my friend says something, I consider that a bond. Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time, and I withdraw my amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The amendment is withdrawn. Amendment No. 179 Offered…





