I thank the gentleman from New York for bringing this issue to light. As you can see, I am serving in this uniform. We are all citizens here tonight. No one outranks another. As a matter of fact, we all serve at the pleasure of our constituents, and we ask to earn their votes. With that, I want to join my colleagues in this call for a second special counsel to investigate the abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court. Knowing what we know now, this warrant was based off of a bogus news report which was based off of a bogus document that was commissioned much like, Mr. Speaker, someone commissions an artist for a painting and said: Well, we want this information to make the other guy look bad, so we are going to pay you. You go get the information, put it together in a nice format for us, and then we are going to act like it is real. I say that because, right now, there doesn't seem to be any evidence that says that any of it is real, no evidence after over a year of investigation. So they commissioned this dossier, which is just a fancy name for a file, to go get the other guy, and they use that to get a FISA warrant and investigate him using the power of the Federal Government, the highest power, to investigate a private citizen. Now, this begs the question, Mr. Speaker: Did these partisans intentionally mislead the FISA court? That is the question.…
Share
More from Scott Perry
If we are funding this organization to deal with the border, I don't know what to say other than it is duplicative. I have been to each one of these States, and of course, people who own a bakery want a parking lot. I had a business, too…
I’m not worried. I got a vote, and if somebody’s gonna ask me to vote to bankrupt the country — I don’t know what that coalition is, but I’m not going to be in it.
Let's make this simple: caving to Democrats and not paying CBP and ICE is agreeing to defund Law Enforcement and leaving our borders wide open again.
the community funding process, just understand if you are not familiar with congressional jargon, that equals earmark. That is three-quarters of a million dollars to this organization that heretofore hasn't needed the money because they…





