Apparently, I was the reasonable one in the room because this amendment offered by Mr. Norman would eliminate funding for the Denali Commission, and I can support that as well. The Denali Commission is one of seven regional commissions that help direct Federal funds to State and local projects. However, unlike other commissions, the Denali Commission serves only one State--Alaska. This has led some, including the Office of the Inspector General for the Denali Commission, to question the need for the commission since the Federal funds handled by the commission could easily be distributed to the State of Alaska and other local entities without going through the step of yet one more bureaucracy. After all, State and local governments are more knowledgeable and better equipped than the Federal Government to address the needs of local communities. I think we all would recognize that. Both the Government Accountability Office and Congressional Budget Office have raised concerns about the need for the Denali Commission, as have I. Eliminating funding for the Denali Commission was also suggested, as you know, by the Obama administration and the Trump administration. At a time when our growing national debt has surpassed $33 trillion, we cannot continue to use taxpayer dollars to fund wasteful, unnecessary, and duplicative programs.…
Share & report
More from Scott Perry
I suspect that Representative Pfluger would be aghast at the claim that this is a legislative earmark. There is no money involved in this. By the way, the air quality has continued to improve. Since 1990, ozone concentration has decreased…
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Pennsylvania will be postponed. Amendment No. 48 Offered by Mr. Perry The Acting CHAIR. It…
This amendment strikes the funding for the Council on Environmental Quality. Now, it sounds lofty and awesome. The Council on Environmental Quality was created by the National Environmental Policy Act in 1969 to advance environmental…
This amendment prohibits the use of funds to take retaliatory actions against States that disagree with the EPA- mandated pollutant reduction goals that have been imposed upon them by the EPA. Importantly, this amendment would not prevent…





