And so this is a matter that a ``no'' vote really means that you are willing to allow this matter to be buried, never to come before the House, and that you are willing to accept the fact that a guilty plea with regard to embezzlement and potential involvement of Members of Congress is something that the House is willing to ignore. I mean, to say that you vote ``no'' is to ignore the public pleading and suggest that the House has no further action to take.
Editor's note · Context
Walker addresses the implications of voting 'no' on a matter related to embezzlement and Congressional accountability.
Share
More from Robert Walker
As I understand it, does the amendment not say, ``limitation on activities,'' and, as I understand it, it says: Members of the United States Armed Forces who perform defense services or provide military education and training outside the…
No, we were going to have those hearings, and then he also promised comprehensive hearings on Whitewater would be held.
But the President came up here and told us about that. What about crime? The President has said that the crime bill is a major priority. Surely they have included the crime bill?
the fact is the Department of Agriculture and NIH opted out of the licensing procedure at NTIS. The technologies available are still at NTIS. You can still find out what the technologies are that can be transferred to you through NTIS…





