What we did not hear is what this bill fails to do, and that is deal with the special interest power as it lobbies the administration. There is an awful lot of concern about that. Very recently, the Capital Research Center has done a rather elaborate look at what kind of special interest power is influencing the administration, and the direct ties of members of the administration with special interest groups. If we just look at one department, it gives us concern. These are the kinds of things not addressed in this bill at all. In one department, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Secretary has direct ties to the Citizens Transition Project, the national Council on Aging, and the National Unity Task Force. The Secretary has direct ties to the Community Information Exchange, the National Community Development Association, and the National Council of State Housing Agencies. The Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity has direct ties to California Women Lawyers, the Lesbian Rights Project of Equal Rights Advocates, Inc., the National Center for Lesbian Rights, and the United Way of the Bay Area.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about special interest influence on the administration during debate on a bill.
Share
More from Robert Walker
I thank the gentleman from Missouri [Mr. Emerson]. He helps make my point, because it is extremely important to recognize that if someone out in the country would have a complaint of regulatory problems, the Administrator under this…
I know of a number of our colleagues who have literally hung around for days waiting for their amendments to come up. It seems to me that by placing a limitation on five amendments, we could reach a time where a couple of those amendments…
That was an interesting point that was just raised by the chairman of the subcommittee with regard to the numbers. He makes the point that their numbers are consistent with the President's original presentation. However, when the…
I want to say, first of all, that no one is talking about condoning violence in any kind of demonstration at any time. We are not talking violence here. We are talking justice. The question here before us today is in part whether or not we…





