This gets to the heart of this 168-to-4 number. The vast majority of the 168 are at the district court level, trial court level. What the Senator from Kansas is saying--and I want to make it clear-- the district court judges, by and large, do not make law. They are trying cases. Appellate court judges, we have seen now in recent years, have begun to take on the mantle of legislator in making law, and therefore all of the nominees who are being blocked on that side are these quasi-legislative-type judges. The Senator is suggesting the superlegislator is the Supreme Court. So if we are in for filibusters for appellate courts, can anyone imagine what a Supreme Court nominee fight will look like in the Senate now versus 20 or 30 years ago?
On the recordNovember 12, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of judicial nominations and filibusters in the Senate.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Aug 22, 2020
The whole focus on suburban women and the issue of crime and the weakness of Democrats and the defund the police, all those things are actually playing right into - look, the chance that Donald Trump has in this election is that the…
Jan 5, 2021
Joe Biden is not going to be successful. We're not going to bring this country together, if we continue the rhetoric at the level that we have seen.
Feb 18, 2020
I think he's going to be a disruptive force. And he's going to be a disruptive force at a time when the President feels like there are people in, you know, in and around who have, you know, not had his back and not been fair to him.





