There is a dependent clause after ``Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year . . .'' It then says `` . . . unless three-fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.'' So there is an option clearly stated in the constitutional amendment; is there not?
Rick Santorum: “There is a dependent clause after ``Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal…”
On the recordFebruary 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing a constitutional amendment related to fiscal policy.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Dec 27, 2020
I mean, it's pretty clear to everybody that the President is not going to win this election and that nothing is going to happen on January 6th to overturn it.
Apr 25, 2021
We came here and created a blank slate. We birthed a nation from nothing. There was nothing here. Yes, we have native Americans. But there isn’t much Native American culture in American culture.
Dec 29, 2020
If you listen, just listen to what Josh Hawley is saying. He basically is saying the same thing, in my opinion that Barbara Boxer said, which is I can't certify this election, knowing of the irregularities that I believe happened in Ohio.





