There is a dependent clause after ``Total outlays for any fiscal year shall not exceed total receipts for that fiscal year . . .'' It then says `` . . . unless three-fifths of the whole number of each House of Congress shall provide by law for a specific excess of outlays over receipts by a rollcall vote.'' So there is an option clearly stated in the constitutional amendment; is there not?
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a constitutional amendment related to fiscal policy.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
The Commission on Presidential Debates has to, you know, take the role that they're there, which is not the leader of the free world, but to actually facilitate information for the public so they can make good decisions.
I mean, it's pretty clear to everybody that the President is not going to win this election and that nothing is going to happen on January 6th to overturn it.
If you listen, just listen to what Josh Hawley is saying. He basically is saying the same thing, in my opinion that Barbara Boxer said, which is I can't certify this election, knowing of the irregularities that I believe happened in Ohio.
the Trump campaign is the one that's out there. They're the most visible. They're on the ground. There's a lot of energy, a lot of enthusiasm and that there is a surge.





