I know both Senators know about the Fleming v. Nestor case in 1960--a U.S. Supreme Court case that said that Social Security benefits are not guaranteed. You do not have a private property right to Social Security benefits. It is a political promise. We saw evidence of that in 1977 and 1983 with those amendments to the Social Security Act which reduced benefits. So we are talking about this great guarantee, this incredible, infallible promise. Yet we have seen cuts in Social Security by previous Congresses. My question is, Can the Senator tell me that the 1977 and the 1983 amendments are not examples of what you would call a guaranteed benefit and how those reductions in benefits square with you telling the American public that there is a guaranteed benefit?
Rick Santorum: “I know both Senators know about the Fleming v. Nestor case in 1960--a U.S. Supreme Court case that said that Social…”
On the recordSeptember 22, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the reliability of Social Security benefits during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Apr 25, 2021
We came here and created a blank slate. We birthed a nation from nothing. There was nothing here. Yes, we have native Americans. But there isn’t much Native American culture in American culture.
Aug 24, 2022
Republicans have to start paying attention. This is a red wave year. The polls are not showing it right now.
Dec 22, 2020
What Donald Trump is doing right now is affirming is affirming one thing, and that is that he believes he's not going to be president on January 20th.
Dec 27, 2020
It's pretty inexplicable to me. You know, the fact that he went ahead and signed these two bills is -- there really isn't a good reason to have held off.





