I was just questioning. Are you suggesting that negligible amounts could mean rather extraordinary amounts? You are not suggesting that a Member of the Senate would violate his constitutional oath of office to uphold the Constitution which requires a balanced budget? You would not be suggesting that someone would deliberately violate their oath of office by allowing a large deficit to occur when the Constitution says that cannot occur?
Questioning the implications of budgetary decisions and constitutional obligations during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
What Donald Trump is doing right now is affirming is affirming one thing, and that is that he believes he's not going to be president on January 20th.
Let's try to make it a an opportunity for unity that he wants to accomplish.
I mean, it's pretty clear to everybody that the President is not going to win this election and that nothing is going to happen on January 6th to overturn it.
Joe Biden is not going to be successful. We're not going to bring this country together, if we continue the rhetoric at the level that we have seen.
Other voices in this conversation
