I too feel that we here in the Senate, when it comes to justice, really should be jurors, and that we should get all the information. The information shared, I think, as correctly stated by my colleague from Pennsylvania and by the Senator from Alabama, was well presented. But that is information that we received from the District Attorneys Association opposed to her nomination, without any rebuttal or explanation from Judge Massiah-Jackson. I will admit that some of those cases I find it hard to find out what a good explanation would be. But that is not for me to prejudge, nor as a juror should you prejudge those things. So I am willing to listen. I think she needs to be given an opportunity. I am hopeful that either this evening or sometime tomorrow we will be able to come up with a plan on how we are going to proceed with her nomination and have her nomination received in a fair fashion.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Judge Massiah-Jackson and the need for a fair evaluation process.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Republicans have to start paying attention. This is a red wave year. The polls are not showing it right now.
This is a moment where presidents matter. This is a moment when you -- as David said, in the last few days I think things have really change, attitudes and moods have changed in this country.
I think he's going to be a disruptive force. And he's going to be a disruptive force at a time when the President feels like there are people in, you know, in and around who have, you know, not had his back and not been fair to him.
I mean, it's pretty clear to everybody that the President is not going to win this election and that nothing is going to happen on January 6th to overturn it.





