the Senator from Louisiana keeps bringing up the point about the Federal Government contributing 100 percent, not having the benefit of any savings. I just suggest to you that if what we want to accomplish here is savings in the welfare system, the 90-percent maintenance effort will do more to reduce those savings than anything we have seen produced. The fact of the matter is, yes, his amendment may be scored as a reduction in Federal outlays. But I suggest, Mr. President, if you went back to the Congressional Budget Office and said, ``What would be the increase in State spending as a result of this amendment,'' you would see that it would be more than offset in the reductions in Federal spending. What does that mean? That means from the average taxpayer who does not care whether the money is being spent on the Federal level or State level, they are going to pay more for welfare. That is the bottom line here. It is not how much the Federal Government saves, or how much the State government saves, or how much we spend and they spend, but how much the taxpayers spend on the program. I think what your amendment will do is net result in higher welfare expenditures. Sure, they will have to pay more State taxes or more money to the State than the Federal if we equal them out dollar for dollar in taxes. The fact of the matter is your amendment will cause States to spend even more money than what we save on the Federal side. I think that is clear.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed amendment on federal and state welfare spending.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
I mean, it's pretty clear to everybody that the President is not going to win this election and that nothing is going to happen on January 6th to overturn it.
I always say the campaigns are about to the future, not about the past. I mean, obviously the president is going to tout his record on the economy, but I think he needs to -- they need to focus more on what they're going to do in the…
The President should make his records available as to when he was tested and what the results of those tests are.
I think this puts Republican, particularly two senators in Georgia in a very tough bind to have a president, you know, having voted for the National Defense Authorization Act now, having to decide whether they're going to buck the…





