On the recordMay 6, 1999
I rise as a member of the Banking Committee to, first, express my support for the bill. I think the chairman has done an admirable job in trying to fashion a bill that takes what was a very complicated, overly complex measure last year and simplified it and streamlined a lot of the organizational structures and dealt with things in a much more straightforward fashion. I think as a result, we have a much cleaner and much better, more understandable, from an administrative point of view, proposal than what we were dealing with last year. I commend the chairman for that. Just like every other Member here, there are certain parts of the bill of which I am less supportive. In fact, some parts of the bill I am not supportive of at all and feel it is an obligation of mine to come forward and do what I can to make some of those changes. One section of the bill that I do not support is section 304. Section 304 extends for 3 years the differential that savings institutions, thrifts, have to pay vis-a-vis banks on what are called FICO obligations or FICO bonds.
Source
govinfo.gov




