Yes. The term I use over and over again is that these are inspectors, not investigators. These are not detectives. This concept that inspectors will find a smoking gun is absurd. It is absurd. They will not because they are not looking for a smoking gun. It is not their mission to find a smoking gun. They are there, as the Senator from Arizona quoted our people at the Defense Department--Paul Wolfowitz--they are there to determine whether Saddam is telling us the truth in the information he has given us. Since he has not given us any information as to what he has done with his weapons of mass destruction, it is very difficult for them to determine whether he is telling the truth. So this whole concept, No. 1, that the burden of proof is on the United States of America or on the United Nations or on these weapons inspectors to find what Saddam has is false. And the expectation that there is some smoking gun we must show Members of the Senate, people in America, or people around the world, as some countries have indicated, is absurd on its face.
On the recordJanuary 30, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the role of weapons inspectors in relation to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Apr 25, 2021
We came here and created a blank slate. We birthed a nation from nothing. There was nothing here. Yes, we have native Americans. But there isn’t much Native American culture in American culture.
Nov 1, 2020
I disagree with the Supreme Court. I think the legislature should make the rules with respect to when the votes are counted, not the courts.
Dec 22, 2020
I think this puts Republican, particularly two senators in Georgia in a very tough bind to have a president, you know, having voted for the National Defense Authorization Act now, having to decide whether they're going to buck the…





