I do not believe the Senator from New Hampshire used the word ``privatization.'' My colleagues will not hear me use the term ``privatization.'' Privatization intimates to the American public that we are going to abandon the current Social Security system and turn it over to completely private accounts, which is not what any proposal on this side of the aisle or what the President's commission suggested. What the President's commission suggested, what every bill over on this side of the aisle proposes--and, by the way, joined in a bipartisan fashion and has historically been a bipartisan issue--is to take a portion of the contribution that comes into the Social Security Administration and give people the option voluntarily to establish a personal retirement account to be part of their Social Security benefit which continues to be guaranteed as it is, as much as it is, under current law. So let's understand that we are still talking about the foundation of this system being the same. What we are talking about is trying to solve the problem, a problem that my two colleagues on the other side of the aisle did not address.
On the recordSeptember 22, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing Social Security reform and the concept of personal retirement accounts.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
Dec 27, 2020
It's pretty inexplicable to me. You know, the fact that he went ahead and signed these two bills is -- there really isn't a good reason to have held off.
Aug 22, 2020
I always say the campaigns are about to the future, not about the past. I mean, obviously the president is going to tout his record on the economy, but I think he needs to -- they need to focus more on what they're going to do in the…
Oct 30, 2020
the Trump campaign is the one that's out there. They're the most visible. They're on the ground. There's a lot of energy, a lot of enthusiasm and that there is a surge.





