I have not asked for someone's opinion on what ought to be or what could be. What I have asked for is an example. I wanted a fact circumstance to be provided as to where this would be the best, this would be appropriate, this would be medically indicated. Not in any of the letters I have seen entered into the Record, or in any testimony, has anybody come forward with a factual circumstance that would support the general statements that it 'may be.' Well, it may be a lot of things, but the point is, there are no examples that support the 'may be.' All I have asked for--and I have not received a response--is an example for us to look at, to have peer-reviewed, and to determine whether there is in fact a situation that has heretofore not been put in the Record, which is an example of a medical condition that would indicate a partial-birth abortion would be indicated to deal with as the best alternative.
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the lack of factual examples supporting claims about partial-birth abortion during a debate.
Share
More from Rick Santorum
I think the President just picked the wrong one. So I don't think that was a political wind shift. I just think he picked the wrong bill to veto.
If you're a young person, that's not a particularly enticing thing to hear and -- because that's going to have a huge impact on you, and your ability to provide for yourself and your family.
I think he's concerned that this information is being fed out there and that it leads to exactly what your previous guests had talked about, you know, dissension and conflict between Democrats and Republicans.
You know, rhetorically I think Joe Biden has hit the notes very, very well. Substantively, as you can imagine, I'm not particularly excited about many of the things he is talking about doing. But I think his tone has been very, very good.





