On the recordMarch 12, 2003
just to reiterate, I do not believe we should support the motion to commit. As I stated before, this is a piece of legislation we have had on the Senate floor. This is the fifth debate on the floor of the Senate. The Judiciary Committee has held two hearings and reported the bill out. It is not exactly the same. As I said before, it is not identical. We have addressed issues of health and vagueness, but the substance is the same. We are talking about the same thing. We are talking about changing roughly 20 words in the statute. I think that is a small enough change for Members of the Senate to digest without the Judiciary Committee going through and giving its opinion. The Senator from Utah, Senator Hatch, came to the floor and addressed the issues. Other members of the Judiciary Committee have been here and done likewise, many of whom are cosponsors of this ban. I believe this is, frankly, going to delay consideration of this legislation. It will not have any impact or import in the long run to our deliberations. I think Members of the Senate are fully able to make this decision at this time being well versed after this debate. We have had a good debate over the last 3 days. We will continue to do so, prior to passage. I think it is time to move forward. I hope my colleagues will join me in opposing the motion to commit.
Source
govinfo.gov




