And what is particularly perverse about it, to respond to the gentleman, is we are talking here about permanent tax increases, to provide temporary protection to other taxpayers. Ultimately they have created a series of PAYGO rules that allow them to go in each year, hold certain taxpayers harmless, but at the expense of permanent increases in revenue into the foreseeable future. What they are doing is setting up a system that can be gamed that will permit them to go forward and raise taxes each year without calling it a tax increase where they are trying to avoid the label. I think that is particularly perverse because what it assumes, even as Republicans for years when they were in power each year tried to look for ways of cutting taxes, it seems like the Democrats have set up a PAYGO system by which they will be able to go in each year and justify tax increases. They may call some of it loophole closing, but it is higher taxes, and they are going to be looking for more and more creative ways for generating more revenue for years to come, particularly as the cost of patching under their rules, the cost of patching the AMT each year grows higher.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of PAYGO rules and tax increases during a floor debate.
Share
More from Philip English
there was a time when our national leaders publicly felt the ability to invoke the Creator and invite His blessings on our national causes. On D-Day, June 6, 1944, President Franklin D. Roosevelt read a nationally broadcast prayer as our…
I recently introduced a new version of legislation that I have introduced in the past, the Simplified USA Tax, or SUSAT, which reforms individual and business taxation while promoting economic growth, investment and personal savings, all…
Mr. Speaker, our friends on the other side of the aisle have proposed a so-called energy bill that they claim will promote America's energy independence. In reality, Mr. Speaker, the Democrats have presented the House Chamber with a…
the opposition to this fairly straightforward trade agreement has generated not one, not two, but a whole school of red herrings that I think have to be knocked down quickly in succession. We have heard a little of it already this…





