On the recordMay 5, 2004
Mr. Speaker, I just want to make sure everybody is very clear as we have this discussion that if this proposed provision were to become binding, the net effect is almost certainly a very, very major tax increase. All we are talking about is, what I want to do here is let us make sure we can maintain existing tax law. What the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Moore) is proposing is that under existing law, unfortunately, taxes are scheduled to go up. If we prevent that by making sure we maintain the existing rate structure, the existing tax law, we would have to come up with these huge offsets, which we certainly are not going to get the votes over there to do that with spending cuts, so we would have to raise taxes somewhere else. So the net effect is a huge tax increase. What are some of the things that are scheduled to expire, some of the problems that we would have if this were adopted? Well, we would find we would get the marriage penalty coming back in full force. We get the child tax credit that would be diminished dramatically. The increase in the size of the 10 percent bracket, that goes away. Small business expensing which has probably contributed significantly to this economic turn around. That goes away. Small businesses cannot expense items the way they can under current law.
Source
govinfo.gov




