Political Quotes

On the recordJuly 20, 2004
I do not think that the best argument for having zero as our volatility number is actually a plausible argument, that valuing these options is inherently a very difficult task and assigning the appropriate volatility is very difficult. I prefer the argument that we should not be expensing these at all. See, I think what some of my colleagues are confusing here is the difference between value and expense. Nobody is disputing that a stock option has value, but what I would dispute very vigorously is that issuing an option is equal to an expense on the part of the company issuing it. Let us look at what happens. You grant an option to an employee. There is no cash outlay, and in fact, if that option expires worthless, there never will be a cash outlay. And, yet, if this amendment were to be adopted and became law, you would have to show an expense on an income statement in which no expense ever is incurred.
Said by
Pat Toomey
Republican · Pennsylvania

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the treatment of stock options and their valuation during a legislative debate.

Share

More from Pat Toomey

Jul 13, 2022

Dependency on countries like China poses a huge economic risk and an unacceptable national security risk.

congress.gov
Aug 1, 2022

As I've said before, Government, and especially this Administration, have often been the problem, not the solution, when it comes to housing.

congress.gov
Aug 1, 2022

Government actions that raise my costs ultimately impact my residents and my ability to provide affordable housing.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation