On the recordJuly 20, 2004
I do not think that the best argument for having zero as our volatility number is actually a plausible argument, that valuing these options is inherently a very difficult task and assigning the appropriate volatility is very difficult. I prefer the argument that we should not be expensing these at all. See, I think what some of my colleagues are confusing here is the difference between value and expense. Nobody is disputing that a stock option has value, but what I would dispute very vigorously is that issuing an option is equal to an expense on the part of the company issuing it. Let us look at what happens. You grant an option to an employee. There is no cash outlay, and in fact, if that option expires worthless, there never will be a cash outlay. And, yet, if this amendment were to be adopted and became law, you would have to show an expense on an income statement in which no expense ever is incurred.
Source
govinfo.gov




