On the recordMay 23, 2016
In fact, doesn't the Administration argue that this is not a legally binding agreement with respect to Iran but, rather, a set of political commitments?
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Toomey questions the nature of the agreement with Iran, suggesting it's not legally binding.
Share
More from Pat Toomey
Jul 13, 2022
Last year, China conducted two hypersonic missile tests which the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark Milley, described as being very close to a Sputnik moment for the United States.
Jul 11, 2022
I just think that fare evasion is an important violation of the law that the FTA should be tracking.
Other voices in this conversation
