On the recordMay 23, 2016
In fact, doesn't the Administration argue that this is not a legally binding agreement with respect to Iran but, rather, a set of political commitments?
Source
congress.govIn fact, doesn't the Administration argue that this is not a legally binding agreement with respect to Iran but, rather, a set of political commitments?
Toomey questions the nature of the agreement with Iran, suggesting it's not legally binding.
Share
More from Pat Toomey
We owe it to each customer to get to the bottom of the FTX implosion, and any violations of the law should be aggressively prosecuted.
I think Congress really has to take the time to properly evaluate the outbound CFIUS concept rather than rushing to enact legislation that is not properly vetted.
It's a budgetary gimmick that has the intent of making it possible to have a huge explosion in unrelated spending. This is not what this bill was about. We can fix it. We can do it immediately.