Mr. Speaker, all year long as we have been wading through the budget and the appropriations process, we here in this House have been debating the proper level of the Federal Government spending. Despite a clear institutional bias I would argue on the part of the Federal Government in general to spend ever more dollars, by and large the Republican majority in this House and many of our colleagues on the other side of the aisle have exhibited a great deal of restraint in the growth of government in general, and, frankly, we have been very responsible with our budgeting thus far. I would like to reflect for a moment just on what we have done. First of all, we have set aside the Social Security surplus for the next 10 years in our budget. We have provided priority funding for key government functions, such as defense and education. I think we have recognized by and large the importance of maintaining the projected surpluses so that we can pay down some debt and reduce taxes. My point is, Mr. Speaker, that, by and large, this body has been doing a great job demonstrating some fiscal discipline.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing federal budget and appropriations process during a House floor speech.
Share
More from Pat Toomey
I think you have said that you think we still, nevertheless, need to have some kind of outbound investment review mechanism, even though you have just said we already have the authorities to prevent any kind of technology transfer.
Democrats' wasteful spending, growth-killing regulation and excessively accommodative monetary policy are exactly what led to 40-year high inflation.
Every month Americans are falling further and further behind because of President Biden's out of control inflation.
We should avoid the temptation to adopt new so-called tenant protections or permanent rental assistance that will have negative unintended consequences.





