Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. This amendment would block the construction of Federal buildings in Washington, D.C., and with all due respect to the gentleman from Montana, it is based on a fundamental misconception. It is not like these projects go up at the whim of the administration. Buildings have to have appropriated funding, and there is a prospectus process on the authorizing side. This is a misguided amendment. Mr. Chair, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Matt Cartwright
Finally, what it does is it throws up the white flag in our war against climate change. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in this country, General Milley, has identified climate change as a threat to national security, and he is right. We…
Mr. Chair, I oppose the amendment, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Montana (Mr. Rosendale). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 91 Offered by…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this particular amendment. Again, it is about protecting investors. The SEC's rule addressing conflicts of interest in the use of this so-called predictive data analytics by broker-dealers and…
Mr. Chair, I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee will be postponed. The Acting CHAIR. The Chair understands amendment…





