Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. It is an amendment that would block the SEC's rule to require companies to disclose material cybersecurity incidents to their investors. As SEC Chair Gary Gensler puts it: Whether a company loses a factory in a fire--or millions of files in a cybersecurity incident--it may be material to investors. Mr. Chair, many public companies already provide their investors with cybersecurity incident disclosures. These rules merely make such disclosures more consistent and comparable in a way that can be useful for those making investment decisions. Why in the world would you want to invest in a company that hides its cybersecurity incidents? Efforts like this amendment would undermine transparency and provide investors with less useful information regarding material cybersecurity events. I strongly oppose this amendment, and I urge a ``no'' vote. Mr. Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Matt Cartwright
Mr. Chairman, the amendment is opposed, and I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Tennessee (Mr. Ogles). The amendment was agreed to. Amendment No. 83 Offered…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to this amendment which would hinder efforts to promote transparency and accountability in small business lending and create hurdles for lenders and community organizations working to help women-owned…
We are kind of coming up on a similar thing right now. We have broadband internet access in most places in this country right now, but there are places being left behind.
Mr. Chair, I rise in opposition to this amendment. The SEC's 2022 proxy adviser rule promotes transparency and accountability by requiring proxy advisory firms to provide more disclosure about their methodologies, their potential conflicts…





