I acknowledge my colleague from Colorado. However, his silence on the point I was making is deafening. The point I made is that cutting out EAJA from this act means that you are attacking successful claims. If your point is to attack frivolous lawsuits, you don't cut out reimbursing legal fees and costs for successful claims. What are we really up to by doing that? I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from Matt Cartwright
These are men and women that have dedicated their lives to the protection of American citizens.
The first question I have, and we heard it tonight, we heard the statement, the assertion that Social Security for generations has been the single most important income support program in America and has lifted millions upon millions of…
We have also heard talk about this Republican Study Committee, which is a group of 80 percent of the Republicans here in the United States House of Representatives, and it is a committee that came up with a proposal about Social Security…
Other voices in this conversation
