I am intrigued by the other side's definition of what constitutes ``open and honest.'' After all, that was their pledge to America last year: if given control of Congress, they would make it the most open and honest Congress ever. So how has it been going? They started their new openness campaign by not allowing a single amendment to be offered on legislation for nearly a month. That's right. That's right. No amendments from Republicans. Not long after that, they had threatened to clamp down on a basic right of the minority, the motion to recommit that hasn't been changed since 1822. And now that appropriations season is officially under way, more progress. The Democrats decided to take the earmark process behind closed doors and away from the public eye. Closed rules, threatening basic minority rights, secret slush funds for earmark spending. Mr. Speaker, these tactics seem rather closed and deceptive to be taking place in the most ``open and honest'' House in history.
Joe Pitts: “I am intrigued by the other side's definition of what constitutes ``open and honest.'' After all, that was their pledge…”
Editor's note · Context
Criticizing the lack of transparency and openness in Congress under Democratic control.
Share
More from Joe Pitts
It seems illogical that the USDA would be given the exclusive authority to oversee and regulate catfish only while the FDA regulates all other seafood.
I thank my colleague, Rep. Pete Olson, for sponsoring this important legislation which will be welcome news for the over 100,000,000 people afflicted with diabetes or pre-diabetes.
the jurisdictional grab serves only to shield catfish farmers against competition at the expense of U.S. consumers.
H.R. 1807, the Sickle Cell Disease Research, Surveillance, Prevention, and Treatment Act of 2015, sponsored by Rep. Danny Davis (IL) and Rep. Michael Burgess (TX) reauthorizes a sickle cell disease demonstration program.





