Political Quotes

On the recordSeptember 28, 2015
The bipartisan bill before us today is a much-needed fix for small- business owners and employees struggling to comply with the healthcare law. H.R. 1624 is a bill to amend the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Public Health Service Act to revise the definition of small employer. The bill would allow the States to continue defining the small group health insurance market as employers with 1 to 50 employees. Section 1304 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act changed the Federal definition of the small group market to include employers with 1 to 100 employees. The States, however, have been allowed to continue defining the small group market as employers with 1 to 50 employees until January 1, 2016. But beginning on or after January 1, 2016, plans sold or renewed for employers with 51 to 100 employees will be subject to the various small group health plan regulations established by PPACA. These more restrictive rating rules will increase health insurance premiums for these employers and reduce flexibility in benefit design. The new requirements could also lead some employers with 51 to 100 employees to self-insure to avoid higher premiums. If that happens, this could result in adverse selection in the small group pool and higher premiums for employers with 1 to 50 employees. Unless this current law is reversed, the disruption in the marketplace will be significant.…
Said by
Joe Pitts
Republican · Pennsylvania

Share

More from Joe Pitts

Dec 6, 2016

The time of 10 o'clock having arrived, I will call this subcommittee meeting to order.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

It is unfortunate that we have a Congress of the United States, the majority parties that want to just tear down this law.

congress.gov
Sep 13, 2016

Administrator Slavitt, CMS announced that APTC and CSR subsidies would be ended for 2016 enrollees who received APTCs in 2014 but did not reconcile these payments on their federal taxes.

congress.gov
Dec 6, 2016

Explicitly creating a program exclusively for catfish seems to be unnecessary, and it directs resources away from high-risk foods.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation