On the recordMay 24, 2011
Reduced insurance premiums for some people are little consolation for the consumers who, under H.R. 371, would be left without coverage.
Source
congress.govJoe Pitts: “Reduced insurance premiums for some people are little consolation for the consumers who, under H.R. 371, would be left…”
Editor's note · Context
Pitts argues that lower premiums do not compensate for loss of essential health coverage.
Share
More from Joe Pitts
Dec 6, 2016
The jurisdictional grab serves only to shield catfish farmers against competition at the expense of U.S. consumers.
Dec 6, 2016
The time of 10 o'clock having arrived, I will call this subcommittee meeting to order.
Sep 13, 2016
It is embarrassing that in the most capable country in the world, in the most powerful elected bodies in the world that we effectively have done almost nothing to improve the health care of Americans since this law has been passed.
Dec 6, 2016
It seems illogical that the USDA would be given the exclusive authority to oversee and regulate catfish only while the FDA regulates all other seafood.
Other voices in this conversation
