I am hopeful that as the Members come to the floor, they will picture in their mind the following scene. A high-ranking, high-profile Member of Congress is accused of wrongdoing in one form or another, and that accusation, that allegation, finds itself on the desk of the Attorney General. The Attorney General, under the concept of bill and Bryant, bill/Bryant, may decide to call for an independent counsel, may, and may decide not to even investigate, could quash the whole matter right at the Attorney General's desk, refuse to investigate, refuse to articulate any concern or jurisdiction over that matter. Envision further, I ask the Members as they come up, this high-ranking, powerful Member of Congress happens to be of the same political party as the Attorney General, and the Attorney General, of course, is of the same political party as the President of the United States.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker discusses the implications of political affiliations on investigations of congressional misconduct.
Share
More from Hon. George W. Gekas
recently, back in my district in central Pennsylvania, I had occasion in connection with the armed services holidays and celebrations to appear with a group of women right in the center of the action of Harrisburg, at the capital area, who…
I think the gentleman would feel better if he recognizes, as I do, that in this bill there is a continued movement by the farm communities towards market orientation, and that should help the gentleman.
As everyone knows, the Judiciary has, for almost 2 years now, been working on the expected division of labor in the Immigration and Naturalization Service. On the one hand, we want to streamline the enforcement part of Immigration and…
This legislation was not born of a whim or out of reason of trying to fill a day of litigation where other things could not have been accomplished. This came about as a result of a Federal judge who was shocked by the fact that on certain…





